11 Best AI LinkedIn Post Generators in 2025
We tested every major AI LinkedIn tool to find the best options for voice learning, content quality, and value. Here's our honest comparison.
Disclosure: This comparison is published by Tonemark. We believe our product offers the best value for voice learning and citations, but we've aimed to provide honest assessments of all tools.
Quick Comparison: AI LinkedIn Post Generators at a Glance
| Tool | Best For | Price | Voice Learning | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 Tonemark Top Pick | Founders & thought leaders who value authenticity | $29/mo | ||
#2 EasyGen | LinkedIn creators following trends | $59.99/mo | Claims | |
#3 Kleo | Users who value brand over features | $99/mo | Claims | |
#4 Taplio | Users who need scheduling + analytics + AI | $65-199/mo | Basic | |
#5 Jasper | Enterprise teams with big budgets | $49-125/mo | Basic | |
#6 Copy.ai | Agencies needing AI workflows | $49-249/mo | ||
#7 Writesonic | SEO agencies and bloggers | $16-99/mo | ||
#8 ChatGPT | Users comfortable with prompting | $20/mo | ||
#9 AuthoredUp | Users who want to write themselves | $19.95-59.95/mo | ||
#10 Rytr | Users on tight budgets | $7.50/mo | ||
#11 MagicPost | Basic LinkedIn post generation | TBD |
How We Evaluated These Tools
Does the tool learn YOUR writing style, or just use generic templates? We tested each tool with real writing samples.
Can you verify AI claims? Does the tool show sources? This prevents hallucinations and builds trust.
What features do you get per dollar? We compared feature sets across similar price points.
Does the output sound like YOU or like generic AI? We tested each tool for natural, authentic voice.
The Best AI LinkedIn Post Generators (Detailed Reviews)
Free tier available
Tonemark learns YOUR writing style from 10-20 samples and generates content that sounds genuinely like you. Unique features include citation transparency (every claim links to source) and Two-Track Knowledge Base (separates facts from style).
Pros
- True voice learning from your writing samples
- Citation transparency - verify every AI claim
- Two-Track KB prevents hallucinations
- 50-70% cheaper than competitors
- Unlimited personas included
Cons
- Newer platform (smaller user base)
- No scheduling yet (on roadmap)
- LinkedIn/blog focus (not all content types)
Our Verdict
Best choice for founders and thought leaders who want authentic content. The only tool with citation transparency.
EasyGen ranks #1 for "Write LinkedIn Post" and offers EasyTrend for trending topic discovery. Founded by Ruben Hassid (493K followers). Strong SEO presence but expensive.
Pros
- Trending topic intelligence (EasyTrend)
- Content calendar with scheduling
- Founder has massive social proof
- Chrome extension available
Cons
- Expensive ($60/mo - 107% more than Tonemark)
- No citation system
- LinkedIn-only platform
- Voice learning claims unclear
Our Verdict
Good for trend-followers, but at double the price of Tonemark without citations.
$59/mo founder lifetime
Kleo is founded by Jake Ward and Lara Acosta, established LinkedIn creators. Uses waitlist/cohort model for exclusivity. Claims voice learning but lacks transparency.
Pros
- Strong founder credibility
- Chat-based collaboration
- Research & topic discovery
- Exclusivity creates community
Cons
- Very expensive ($99/mo - 241% more than Tonemark)
- Waitlist model frustrates users
- No citation system
- LinkedIn-only
Our Verdict
Premium price for brand, not features. Tonemark offers same capabilities 70% cheaper.
Taplio combines AI writing, scheduling, analytics, and engagement tools for LinkedIn. Viral post library with 5M+ examples. More expensive but comprehensive.
Pros
- All-in-one LinkedIn solution
- Viral post inspiration library
- Advanced scheduling and analytics
- Lead generation database
Cons
- Expensive ($65-199/mo)
- AI often sounds generic
- Growth-hack focus over thought leadership
- Limited voice learning (1-3 personas)
Our Verdict
Best for users who want everything in one tool. For authentic voice, pair with Tonemark.
Jasper is the market leader for AI writing with 50+ templates, team collaboration, and brand voice features. Enterprise-focused with premium pricing.
Pros
- Market leader with strong brand
- 50+ content templates
- Team collaboration features
- SEO mode and Chrome extension
Cons
- Expensive for individuals
- Template-based, not true voice learning
- No knowledge base grounding
- Generic output requires editing
Our Verdict
Good for marketing teams. Too expensive and generic for individual founders.
Copy.ai focuses on speed and AI workflows for scaling content production. Strong for agencies handling multiple clients. Sales-focused templates.
Pros
- Powerful workflow automation
- Unlimited words on paid tiers
- 1000+ integrations
- Good for sales copy
Cons
- No voice learning
- Generic output ("sounds like AI")
- Sales/GTM focus, not thought leadership
- No knowledge base
Our Verdict
Best for agencies and sales teams. Not ideal for authentic thought leadership.
Writesonic specializes in SEO blog articles with content planning features. Affordable entry point but not optimized for LinkedIn or social media.
Pros
- Strong SEO features
- Affordable entry tier ($16/mo)
- Content Strategy Planner
- API available
Cons
- SEO-focused, not LinkedIn-optimized
- No voice learning
- Quantity over quality
- Social features are secondary
Our Verdict
Best for SEO articles. Use Tonemark for LinkedIn, Writesonic for blog SEO.
Free tier available
ChatGPT is a general-purpose AI that can write LinkedIn posts with good prompting. Cheapest option but requires manual effort and doesn't remember your voice.
Pros
- Affordable ($20/mo or free)
- General-purpose flexibility
- Custom GPTs for some context
- No vendor lock-in
Cons
- No voice learning (starts from zero each time)
- No knowledge base grounding
- Manual copy-paste workflow
- Can hallucinate facts
Our Verdict
Good for experimentation. For consistent LinkedIn content, specialized tools save time.
AuthoredUp provides templates, hooks, and content organization for LinkedIn - but no AI generation. You still write, it just helps structure.
Pros
- 200+ hooks and CTA templates
- Strong content organization
- LinkedIn analytics
- Affordable entry price
Cons
- No AI generation (you write)
- Templates not personalized
- LinkedIn-only
- Requires your time to write
Our Verdict
Best for DIY writers who want structure. For AI generation, use Tonemark.
Free tier available
Rytr is the most affordable AI writing tool with 40+ templates and 8M+ users. Good for quick copy but lacks voice learning and LinkedIn optimization.
Pros
- Very affordable ($7.50/mo unlimited)
- 40+ templates
- Plagiarism checker included
- Large user base (8M+)
Cons
- Generic template-driven output
- No true voice learning
- No knowledge base
- Not LinkedIn-optimized
Our Verdict
Best for tight budgets. For quality thought leadership, invest in Tonemark.
MagicPost is a LinkedIn-specific AI post generator. India-based with unclear pricing. Limited information available.
Pros
- LinkedIn-specialized
- Focused feature set
- Potentially affordable
Cons
- Limited public information
- No voice learning confirmed
- No citation system
- Unknown pricing
Our Verdict
Needs more research. Consider established alternatives like Tonemark.
How to Choose the Right AI LinkedIn Tool
Best for founders and thought leaders who want content that sounds genuinely like them. Voice learning, citations, and 50-70% cheaper than alternatives.
Best for users who want AI writing, scheduling, analytics, and engagement tools in one platform. Higher price but comprehensive.
Best for users comfortable with prompting who want a general-purpose tool. Requires more time but costs only $20/mo.
Frequently Asked Questions
For voice authenticity and citations, Tonemark is the best choice at $29/mo. For trending topics, consider EasyGen ($60/mo). For all-in-one LinkedIn management, Taplio ($65-199/mo) offers scheduling and analytics alongside AI writing.
Several tools offer free tiers: Tonemark (10 generations/month), ChatGPT (limited), and Rytr (10K characters/month). For serious LinkedIn content, paid tiers starting at $20-30/month provide better results and more generations.
Not if they sound authentic. Generic AI posts perform poorly because audiences recognize them. Tools with voice learning (like Tonemark) produce content indistinguishable from your authentic writing, which performs as well or better than manual posts.
Yes, some tools offer voice learning. Tonemark analyzes 10-20 writing samples to learn your vocabulary, sentence structure, and personality. Most other tools use generic templates or basic tone presets that don't capture your unique voice.
Tonemark offers the best value at $29/mo with voice learning, citations, and Two-Track KB included. Competitors charge $49-99/mo for similar (or fewer) features. For tight budgets, Rytr at $7.50/mo is cheapest but lacks voice learning.
Ready to Try the Best AI LinkedIn Post Generator?
Start with Tonemark's free tier. Upload your writing samples and generate authentic content in minutes.
Start Free TrialNo credit card required - 10 free generations